Hypothesis Validation
Do our three product pillars hold up against the data? Each pillar tested with statistical correlation (Spearman ρ for ordinal scales) and qualitative evidence from open-text responses.
Scorecard
All three pillars statistically confirmed. Priority clarity shows the strongest effect — plan completion drops from
Surprise: tool count has zero correlation with overwhelm (ρ=
Priorities
Follow-Through
Energy
Market Map Bridge
How do pillar scores differ across market segments? Painkiller customers (composite pain ≥ 4) should score worse on pillar indicators if the framework is valid.
1. Priorities
Does difficulty prioritizing predict lower plan completion?
Priority Difficulty × Plan Completion
ρ =What People Say: Priority Blockers
2. Follow-Through
Does overcommitting predict lower plan completion? Does needing external pressure correlate with overcommitting?
Overcommit Frequency × Plan Completion
ρ =What People Say: Strategies That Work vs Fail
Supporting: External Pressure × Overcommit — ρ =
3. Energy
Does overwhelm predict lower plan completion? What drains energy — and is tool count really the driver?
What Drains People
Individual drain types (combos split) ·Mean Overwhelm by Drain Type
Higher = more overwhelmed (1–5 scale) · min N ≥ 3Supporting: Tool Count ≠ Overwhelm — ρ =
Cross-Pillar Independence
Are the three pillars independent problems, or do they cluster? If correlated, fixing one may cascade to others.
What to Build First
Pillar ranking by combined statistical and qualitative evidence strength.