Burnout Risk

8-item normalized composite (α = 0.80 "Good"). Profiles identify the dominant driver — different mechanisms need different product responses. See Methodology for validation. Pattern matching, not clinical diagnosis.

% show severe or struggling burnout profiles (N=). Full Burnout, with a dominant driver (Overwhelmed / Planning Chaos / Demand Overload), at risk. Average score: /5. Scroll to profiles for why, Strategy Intelligence for what to build.

Full Burnout

% — 3+ drivers at crisis

Struggling

% — clear dominant driver

At Risk

% — mixed signals

Healthy

% — coping or thriving

Profile Distribution

Each person gets ONE profile based on their dominant burnout driver. 5 drivers (overwhelm, priority, overcommit, pressure, replanning) + 3 outcomes (completion, QoL, productivity) — all normalized 0–1.

Driver Fingerprint by Work Situation

WHY does each role burn out differently? Mean normalized score (0–1) for each burnout driver and outcome. Darker = higher (worse). Read columns to see a role's unique pain profile; read rows to see which roles struggle most with each dimension.

What Each Profile Needs

LLM-extracted blockers, fix types, and failed strategies per profile. An "Overwhelmed" person needs energy tools; "Planning Chaos" needs decision frameworks; "Demand Overload" needs commitment guardrails.

Profile Needs by Work Situation

Same profiles, different roles. An "Overwhelmed Freelancer" needs different tools than an "Overwhelmed Founder." Select a profile to see how blockers, strategies, and fix types vary by work situation.

Thesis Areas by Burnout Profile

Which execution obstacles hit which burnout profiles? Stacked bars show thesis distribution within each profile — see Blocker Landscape for thesis deep dives.

See Blocker Landscape for thesis-level outcome impact.

Burnout Profile × Target Archetype

Cross-reference between burnout profiles (mechanism of struggle) and target archetypes (pain dimensions). Burnout profiles capture the HOW of struggle; archetypes capture the WHERE (output vs QoL). Together they reveal which product mechanisms serve which pain shapes.

See Target Profile for full archetype analysis.

Strategy Intelligence

What strategies work for whom — and where the product gaps are. LLM-extracted themes from open-text answers, cross-referenced against burnout profiles.

Energy Dimension by Profile

What's depleted in each profile? Stacked bars show total mentions — color shows which profile reports it most.

Strategy Reliance by Profile

How each profile tries to follow through. If Thriving leans on tools while Overwhelmed relies on willpower — that validates the product thesis.

What Healthy Profiles Still Use

What Struggling Profiles Have Abandoned

Product Gap: Where Healthy Profiles Succeed but Struggling Fail

Each line connects Healthy (Thriving + Coping) success rate to Struggling (Full Burnout + driver-dominant) success rate for the same strategy. Longer lines = bigger product opportunity.

Strategy Success Rate by Work Situation

Same strategies from the gap chart above — now by role. Green = strategy succeeds, red = fails. · = insufficient data (N < 2). Cross with gap size above to find your beachhead: which role struggles most with each strategy?

Market Bridge

How do burnout profiles map onto market segments? If struggling profiles are predominantly Painkiller — they're your most urgent customers. If they're spread across segments — the profile signal adds information the market map misses.

Who Burns Out Most? (by Work Situation)

100% stacked bars sorted by Full Burnout + Struggling %. Reveals which roles face the most severe burnout — your highest-urgency segments.

ND as Burnout Amplifier

Neurodivergence impact amplifies burnout severity in a dose-response pattern — mean score climbs monotonically from no-ND to significant-ND. The blocker profile shifts from competing priorities to fatigue and focus disruption at higher ND levels. See Neurodivergence for full analysis.